Skip to main content

How we research

Methodology

How evidence is classified, sourced, reviewed, and shown — and what our labels do and do not mean.

This page is pending owner approval

Approved text will be published here. Research records and their sources remain available.

Labels used on this site

Descriptive review labels, not a scientific certification and not candidate scores.

Stated position
What the subject has said they support or oppose.
Promise or commitment statement
A statement promising a future action or result. A promise is not evidence the result will occur.
Proposal
A specific plan, bill, or policy put forward. Proposed is not enacted.
Recorded vote
An attributable recorded vote, with context.
Other documented action
An order, administrative action, filing, or other attributable act.
Implementation evidence
Evidence that an enacted measure was carried out. Enactment is not implementation.
Measured outcome
A measured result. An outcome during a term is not proof of personal causation.
Forecast or modeled estimate
A projection or modeled estimate, attributed to its author.
Attributed interpretation
An interpretation attributed to a named source, not an observed fact.
Evidence gap
A question the reviewed sources do not yet answer.
High confidence
Strong direct/authoritative evidence for the defined claim, with applicable context and no unresolved material conflict undermining it.
Moderate confidence
Credible evidence, but meaningful applicability, measurement, corroboration, or attribution limits remain.
Limited confidence
Sparse, indirect, incomplete, or materially contested evidence; the limitation is explained.
Insufficient evidence
Available research cannot support a substantive finding; the gap is shown, not a forced conclusion.